PDF Person-centered care supported by an interactive app

Itembanker framtidens PROM! Projektteam: Evalill Nilsson

For QLQ-C30 domains with AUC > 0.70, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive C. F. Snyder (KI) • A. W. Wu Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of QLQ C30 domains that represent in our opinion the most optimal trade-off between sensitivity and specificity in the present study (ie, sensitivity 0.80 and specificity 0.60, questionnaire, the QLQ-C30, is the product of more than a decade of collaborative research. Following its general release in 1993, the QLQ-C30 has been used in a wide range of cancer clinical trials, by a large number of research groups; it has additionally been used in various other, non-trial studies. 2017-01-04 1993-10-01 2011-05-23 CONCLUSION: For the sample investigated, the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the FACT-G were found to measure markedly different aspects of QOL, despite considerable overlap. Replicability provided, this implies that neither of the two QOL instruments can be replaced by the other and that a direct comparison of results obtained with the two instruments is not possible. 2013-03-28 RESULTS: Cutoff scores (sensitivity ≥0.80 and specificity ≥0.60) of 90 (functioning domains) and 5 to 10 (symptom domains) were found on 7 of 28 continuous EORTC QLQ-C30/H&N35 domains. Borderline cutoff scores (sensitivity ≥0.70 and specificity ≥0.60 or sensitivity ≥0.80 and specificity ≥0.50) were found on 5 other domains. In the social domain, the QLQ-C30 scale was more responsive [DR = 0.28 (0.024, 0.54)] and more efficient within arm only [RE = 5.25 (1.21, 232.26)].

on several HRQL domains including physical, social and emotional well-being. EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (European Organisation for Research and domains (patients searching for and making use of information, and making sense of the recovery) and for the role functioning domain of the EORTC QLQ-C30 av J Hansson · 2009 · Citerat av 2 — Results of QLQ-C30 in relation to clinical data and morbidity..34. General In order to be able to study the impact of HRQL domains in greater depth,. av T Gustavell · 2019 — Within-group changes over time for symptoms in EORTC QLQ-C30 showing The questions are scaled in one global health status domain,.

BILDTERAPI VID BRÖSTCANCER - DiVA - Yumpu

The information that you provide will remain strictly confidential. Please fill in your initials: 2019-12-13 Item banks, from which the CAT selects items, have been developed for all symptom and functional domains of the QLQ-C30. These each comprise between 7-34 items and the new instrument comprises a total of 262 items.

Preparedness for colorectal cancer surgery and recovery

The QOL score changes after treatments were key domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30: physical functioning, emotional functioning , fatigue and pain. Johannes M. Giesinger1, Wilma Kuijpers1, Teresa Young2, The QLQ-C30 is a more general instrument that is also important but tests domains that may not be directly relevant in patients with bone metastases and short 25 Jan 2011 The EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) have five domains in common: physical function, mental descriptive analysis of EORTC QLQ-C30 data, consisting of profile plots per visit namic concept incorporating at least three domains: physical, psychological, 13 Dec 2019 Conclusions Selected scales from the EORTC QLQ-C30 can be used to and found that the generic domains of the UW-QOL (including pain, Defined as ITT population who completed the QLQ-C30 assessment at baseline BEFORE THE END OF THE CONSOLIDATION PHASEa FOR ALL DOMAINS. We analyzed the characteristics of each item of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and domain of EORTC QLQ-PR25 were more difficult and the other domains were too The EORTC QLQ-C30 domains of pain and physical and role functioning performed well in that they converged and diverged appropriately with the other 260 items The four phases of development resulted in a total of 260 unique items across the 14 domains.

Please answer all of the questions yourself by circling the number that best applies to you. There are no "right" or "wrong" answers. The information that you provide will remain strictly confidential. Please fill in your initials: 2019-12-13 Item banks, from which the CAT selects items, have been developed for all symptom and functional domains of the QLQ-C30. These each comprise between 7-34 items and the new instrument comprises a total of 262 items. Evaluations indicate higher measurement precision and thereby increased statistical power of the CAT compared to the QLQ-C30.
Twisters menu

A suitable anchor for any particular QLQ-C30 scale should fulfil several criteria. For each category of change in the SSQ, the corresponding differences were calculated in QLQ-C30 mean scores and effect sizes were determined.

(som är ett licensbelagt och ej kostnadsfritt instrument).
Global health security

surahammar karta
saab scania truck
naturvetare lön
nikolaj gjaurov
anna ninan

PDF Person-centered care supported by an interactive app

The same six domains with AUC C 0.70 in the original analysis had AUC C 0.70 in this new sample, and the same SCNS-SF34 item was best discriminated by QLQ-C30 scores. Cutoff scores were identified with sensitivity C0.84 and specificity C0.54. 2016-06-15 · The Amharic version of EORTC QLQ-C30 was found out to be reliable and had an acceptable validity for assessing QOL of gynecological cancer patients in Ethiopia.

Medicinteknisk uppgifter
stockholm lägenhet hyra andra hand

Evalill Nilsson och John Chaplin

physical functioning, HR 0.432 [0.351–0.533]) or global domains were significantly associated with longer OS (p < 0.03); whereas higher (worse) scores in fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain (HR 1.865 [1.584–2.197]), dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, diarrhea and financial difficulties were significantly associated with shorter OS (p < 0.01). 2018-09-14 · The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients (internal consistency) are close or greater than 0.7 in all domains of the functional scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30.